Getting different applications to talk to each other is a problem faced by many companies. Application integration is particularly troublesome when legacy systems are involved, and transferring data between old mainframe systems and more modern applications can be cumbersome and time-consuming. A good deal of time is spent on ensuring this happens, and software is often available to help with the process.
While middle ware exists to help overcome these issues, the permutations of languages, equipment, databases, and operating system are never ending, so it is impossible to cater for every eventuality. If proprietary tools are not available, the the solution is a home-grown procedure to do the job of communicating between systems. Here the skills shortage may affect the maintainability of such software bridges.
Originally it was felt that object oriented databases would overcome these problems for new applications. However, many applications are developed independently, and the problem of duplicate entities persists. The solution would be to have one database, with all applications making use of it, especially for common data.
However, packaged solutions would still depend on their unique databases. This means so there will still be considerable redundancy, necessitating communication via some form of middleware. With packages often being preferred, there is really no solution in sight for this dilemma.
What is needed to resolve the situation today is a situation where an enterprise database with standard modules to update, maintain, and query the common data is created. Any new applications would then simply interface with that central database. Application specific data could be integrated with the enterprise database or kept separate, as appropriate.
Unfortunately this scenario is very much one for the future. At the moment the world of application systems is very imperfect, as companies still struggle to come to terms with their model T applications. What is needed is the same sort of attitude as with machinery, where equipment that still works is quickly replaced by more efficient machines: an approach that drove America to the forefront among manufacturing nations.
In any company, a lot of effort goes int application integration. Because the complexities may be too much to handle, many organizations simply accept the situation and live with the multiple capturing of data. It is to be hoped that some rationalization will occur as the Computer software industry matures. Perhaps future Information Professional will be amazed and the current haphazard approach to such an important business function.
While middle ware exists to help overcome these issues, the permutations of languages, equipment, databases, and operating system are never ending, so it is impossible to cater for every eventuality. If proprietary tools are not available, the the solution is a home-grown procedure to do the job of communicating between systems. Here the skills shortage may affect the maintainability of such software bridges.
Originally it was felt that object oriented databases would overcome these problems for new applications. However, many applications are developed independently, and the problem of duplicate entities persists. The solution would be to have one database, with all applications making use of it, especially for common data.
However, packaged solutions would still depend on their unique databases. This means so there will still be considerable redundancy, necessitating communication via some form of middleware. With packages often being preferred, there is really no solution in sight for this dilemma.
What is needed to resolve the situation today is a situation where an enterprise database with standard modules to update, maintain, and query the common data is created. Any new applications would then simply interface with that central database. Application specific data could be integrated with the enterprise database or kept separate, as appropriate.
Unfortunately this scenario is very much one for the future. At the moment the world of application systems is very imperfect, as companies still struggle to come to terms with their model T applications. What is needed is the same sort of attitude as with machinery, where equipment that still works is quickly replaced by more efficient machines: an approach that drove America to the forefront among manufacturing nations.
In any company, a lot of effort goes int application integration. Because the complexities may be too much to handle, many organizations simply accept the situation and live with the multiple capturing of data. It is to be hoped that some rationalization will occur as the Computer software industry matures. Perhaps future Information Professional will be amazed and the current haphazard approach to such an important business function.
About the Author:
Peggie K. Lambert is an expert in data management and integration. Need to learn more about application integration? If so the author recommends you visit www.liaison.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment